After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. From lie detection tools analyzed at the boundary to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being utilised in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to work these systems and to pursue their legal right for coverage.
It also shows how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from getting at the stations of coverage. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who also are regimented by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-consultation although they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult to get refugees to navigate these systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.